House Passes Financial Reform

This afternoon the House of Representatives took a significant step towards the enactment of comprehensive financial reform legislation, passing the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 (H.R. 4173) by a vote of 223 to 202. Democrats would have preferred a larger margin of victory, but they can take some satisfaction from having now passed three of the Obama Administration's major priorities—climate change, health care, and financial reform.

Throughout the week, the Democratic leadership was forced to fend off several attempts by moderate Democrats to narrow the bill’s provisions, especially those relating to the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA). On Wednesday, word quickly spread around the Capitol that a federal preemption amendment backed by Rep. Melissa Bean and her allies in the New Democrat Coalition faced strong opposition from the White House and Treasury, who were seeking to bar it from consideration on the House floor. The Bean amendment would have broadened the CFPA’s ability to preempt state consumer protection laws. However, following direct negotiations between the New Dems and top Treasury officials, a modified version of Bean’s preemption amendment was ultimately wrapped into a manager’s amendment that passed on Thursday.

Another significant amendment, opposed by House leadership and the White House, was offered by Rep. Walt Minnick (D-ID). Minnick's amendment would have replaced the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) with a Consumer Financial Protection Council (CFPC), comprised of 12 members, including, among others, the Secretary of Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and the chairman of the CFTC and SEC. Although rejected by a vote of 208-223, Minnick was able to pick off 33 Democrats, potentially providing momentum for a CFPA alternative in the Senate where the Banking committee is still working on a bipartisan compromise.

The defeat of the "cramdown" amendment offered by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) was a victory for the banking industry. Conyers' amendment would have enabled bankruptcy courts to modify mortgage repayment periods, reduce interest rates and fees, and lower the mortgage principal balance to the level of a home’s fair market value. Although the House passed similar language as part of the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009 (H.R. 1106) in March, the amendment was rejected today by a vote of 188-241.

Now that Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) got his comprehensive reform package passed before the holidays, the pressure is on Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) to produce results on his side of the Capitol.

It's Baaaaack!

Ample debate time in Washington can bring the good with the bad. As healthcare reform continues to dominate the congressional agenda leading into the fall, lawmakers have been granted an opportunity to finely tune the legislative details of financial reform—but also a window to resurrect previously rejected ideas from the dead.

This week, House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) announced his intention to include the so-called “cramdown” legislation into his chamber's broader financial reform package, injecting new life into a divisive proposal that would allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages by extending the term, reducing the interest rate, or writing down the principal amount.

During a HFSC subcommittee hearing yesterday to assess the progress of the Making Home Affordable (MHA) Program, Chairman Frank joined a chorus of lawmakers in expressing disappointment that the Obama administration’s loan modification program has not assisted more distressed homeowners. According to Treasury data, MHA has only modified the loans of 12 percent of eligible delinquent borrowers. Figures from some of the large banks are even lower, with Wells Fargo reporting 11 percent of eligible borrowers and Bank of America coming in at 7 percent. Despite the low percentages, the administration is citing statistics that the program has helped reduce the monthly payments of 350,000 homeowners since March.
 

Facing stark opposition from the financial industry, the cramdown proposal has now been rejected twice by the Senate—most recently last spring when the Senate voted down an amendment offered by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) by a 51-45 vote. The prospects for passage do not yet appear any better the third time around, but Frank's renewed push could change the momentum. While the Obama administration has not explicitly endorsed cramdown, the administration is not opposed either. When pressed by Democratic lawmakers at yesterday’s House hearing, Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions Michael Barr and the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Assistant Secretary for Housing David Stevens stated that retrospective cramdown legislation would not have a negative effect on the MHA program. Influential Senate Republicans on the banking committee do not expect cramdown to make a comeback. If cramdown is rejuvenated in the Senate, it will likely be due to a change of heart by some of the following ten Senate Democrats who voted against it last spring:

Bennet (CO),Byrd (WV), Carper (DE),Dorgan (ND), Johnson (SD), Landrieu (LA), Lincoln (AR), Nelson (NE),Pryor (AR),Specter (PA)